Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Silent Tsunami

I'll get back to cute pictures and the like soon, but I need to share this with you first.
... the head of the IMF, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, warned of mass starvation and other dire consequences if food prices continued to rise sharply.

"As we know, learning from the past, those kind of questions sometimes end in war," he said.

He said the problem could lead to trade imbalances that may eventually affect developed nations, "so it is not only a humanitarian question."
Grrrrr... because we can't be expected to prevent mass starvation unless there's something in it for us, right? It makes me angry and sad that Mr. Strauss-Kahn has to frame the coming disaster in these terms to have any hope of motivating the richest nations.

According to this CBC article, the World Food Programme needs $755 million just to maintain existing emergency operations as food costs rise.

Here's a letter I'm firing off to Stephen Harper (and copying to my MP) this morning. I encourage you to find out more about what's happening, then ask the Prime Minister and your Member or Parliament to give priority to this "silent tsunami that respects no borders." (Feel free to copy this text into your own email, if you need some inspiration.)

Stephen Harper: pm@pm.gc.ca
Your Member of Parliament: find here

Dear Prime Minister,

In the next few months, Canada (as a member of the G8 and UN) will be presented with a plan to address the mounting global food crisis. As the price of staples like wheat, corn and rice skyrockets, World Bank head Robert Zoellick has warned that “100 million people in poor countries could be pushed deeper into poverty by spiralling prices. …We have to put our money where our mouth is now so that we can put food into hungry mouths. It's as stark as that." 1

Canada is a wealthy nation, and part of what enables us to live at the level of security and luxury that we do is our participation in an unjust world economy. The full effects of rising food and fuel prices may eventually trickle down to us, but long before we directly feel the impact, our most vulnerable neighbours in the global village will be faced with starvation, riots, and weakening political and economic stability. (Many already are, as we have seen in Haiti.)

We have a moral imperative, as fellow human beings, to respond to this crisis quickly. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon estimates that the World Food Programme “needs an extra $755 million to cover the rising costs of existing emergency operations.” 2

I am calling on you, Mr. Harper, to do everything in your power to ensure that Canada steps up to take immediate and meaningful action. Already, President Bush has released $200 million in urgent aid. Britain pledged an immediate $59.7 million on Tuesday. The citizens of this country have shown themselves to be generous and compassionate in the face of global disaster. I urge you on behalf of concerned Canadians, to commit to meeting the goals and targets that will be set forth by the international community without delay.


1 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7344892.stm
2 http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/04/22/un-world-food.html?ref=rss


EDITED TO ADD: If you send a letter to your MP, be sure to sign it with your address so that they know you are one of their constituents. I really encourage you to do that... if twenty or thirty of us all send something off to the MP who covers the tri-city area, it WILL get noticed. (Look at the verbal acrobatics I go through to keep our location hush-hush!)

13 comments:

Ryan Hitchcock said...

Good for you Mel...I must admit I have no idea whats going on in the world scene but I did a little digging after reading your blog yesterday and its pretty sad. It's very cool to see that you sent that letter off. Lets hope it makes an impact.

Janice said...

Thanks Mel. The English newspaper here has been running Food Crisis stories on the front page all week. I never would have thought of writing to Mr.Harper though. I used your letter as a template, and just sent it off now.

According to the Korean Herald, almost 1/2 the population of Pakistan is now "food insecure", and regional export bans are making it impossible to actually get access to the food despite the cost.

thanks for prompting me to action.

Janice said...

p.s. can I copy your letter onto my blog and encourage more people to send it?

mel said...

Yes, yes, please do! And feel free to correct any errors you see.

I was so frustrated to read more and more about the food crisis without a way to respond. It seems that governments need to be moved to action at this point, so I'm hoping that it does some good to send it off to Mr. Harper. I wonder who has the job most pertinent to whatever UN proposal comes down the pipe?

Thank you SO much for letting me know that you were prompted to action, Janice. It encourages my heart.

mel said...

Hey Ryan... I think it's awesome that you took a few minutes to find out more. I'm not sure how much impact my letter will have on its own, but I hope that there will be enough people begging our government to act quickly to make a difference.

norquay said...

There is one piece of information I haven't found yet, and it is this: Is the money now being released by other countries above and beyond their previous commitments, or are they finally paying up? Anyone know?

In one article I read, Canada was commended for keeping close to its financial commitments, and most comments were aimed at those countries who had fallen behind or simply not bothered.

That being said, I'm going to borrow your letter, too. There is more we can do, and we'll do it!

mel said...

That's a good question, Jen.

My understanding is that the rising cost of food necessitates aid beyond what the richest nations have already committed, so funds released now wouldn't be part of meeting previous commitments. Although I'm sure it wouldn't hurt if everyone paid up! Let us know if you find out anything definitive on that.

I'm very interested in the article you mentioned. According to the last round of evaluations, Canada was well short of meeting the 0.7% commitment (contributing only 0.26% of our GNP to international development) and has not set a timetable to meet that commitment. It would be lovely if that has turned around!

norquay said...

Here's the original article I found:

CBC Link

While looking for it, I also came across these two, one right after the other. When I read the first, I thought, "Hooray for Canada!" Then I got to the second, and realized that nothing is quite what it seems.

Hooray?:
National Post

Uh-Oh!:
OXFAM

Nothing is simple, is it?

norquay said...

Sorry - I forgot to add that a lot of this depends on what numbers we're looking at. While it's true we are far from our 0.7%, it's also true that we are trying to keep up with the lower amount we have "re-committed" to. It also depends on which agency is doing the talking - we have committments to world agencies, as well as individual countries.

Ms Sarajevo said...

Hi Mel - I asked my husband (who works for an MP) if these kind of letters actually make a difference, and he said that they really do, which surprised me. He said that his boss right now is involved in lobbying a federal agency on an issue purely based on the large # of letters received from his constits on the issue. But be warned! The MPs will note that you are concerned about this issue in their central database, and you might get more mailings from them! :)

Ms Sarajevo said...

Hi, me again (it's Jodi, by the way). I just wanted to add that it might be a good addition to the letter to urge the PM to increase funding to NGOs who are doing long-term sustainable development in vulnerable countries. While one-time dispersments of emergency aid are necessary at times, a far more effective long-term strategy is to help underdeveloped countries develop more self-reliace as a whole (economy, education, infrastructure etc) rather than just throwing money at them whenever a crisis like this comes up. As well, the sad fact is that multilateral organizations like the WFP are horribly mismanaged - and so any funds that Canada could commit in response to this crisis would be put to much better use by NGOs instead of being lost in the bureaucratic (and often corrupt) layers of the various UN agencies. Don't get me wrong - I'm all for increasing the amount of money we spend on foreign aid, I just think that more of it should be given to NGOs and less of it given multilaterally and bilaterally. But maybe that's an issue for another letter.

mel said...

I appreciate so much the way you lovely readers have dug deeper into this issue!

Jen, you're right that it gets tricky to tell what is going where when it comes to our international commitments, although one source that was looking at our .7% factored in reduced payments to multilateral organizations as well as reduced debt relief.

Jodi (nice to see you!), thanks for your input. I appreciate knowing that letters to MPs do not go unnoticed! I completely agree with you that sporadically throwing money at crises is not the best approach, and doesn't reach the root problems of those crises. My impression is that urgency is required at this point to prevent millions of deaths, but a broader, long-term view is needed in this case particularly... a hard look at the systems that keep so many in deep poverty.

PS - Nice to see you are blogging again! I think I stopped checking for new posts back in spring 2007. I'll have to see what's over there.

Anonymous said...

Hi Mel,
I am so encouraged by your call to action! I am sending a similar letter to our local MP here in BC. Every letter is one more, right?